Not all BOMs are created equal πŸ‘€

2025-05-04

Jason Smith

In the physical world, a Bill of Materials (BOM) is straightforward:

  • πŸ”© You list the parts
  • 🏭 You know the suppliers
  • πŸ“‹ You track inventory

But a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) is…different. And trickier.

Modern software isn’t built from physical parts. It is assembled from code created across the globe 🌍:

  • 🏫 Libraries
  • πŸ“¦ Packages
  • πŸ”— Dependencies
  • πŸ”§ Build tools
  • ⛓️ Sometimes even unknown transitive dependencies (your dependencies’ dependencies)!

On top of that, SBOMs need to be:

  • πŸ€– Machine-readable
  • πŸ› οΈ Up-to-date with every build
  • πŸ“ Traceable to a version and source
  • πŸ’Ό Portable across systems and vendors

This isn’t a list you write once and forget. It is dynamic and it must evolve with your software development lifecycle. ♻️

So yes, the concept of a BOM exists in both hardware and software…but SBOMs? They play a different game entirely. 🧠

Have you ever tried creating or consuming an SBOM? What was the hardest part?

#SBOM #CyberSecurity #SoftwareDevelopment #SupplyChainSecurity #DevSecOps #OpenSourceSecurity #SoftwareSupplyChain #SoftwareTransparency #DigitalTrust #SecureDevelopment #SoftwareIntegrity πŸ”

This post was originally published on LinkedIn. To join the conversation and leave a comment, please visit the original post here.